SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 1499

S.U.KHAN
DINESH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA KUMAR GOEL – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Nigamendra Shukla and Keshari Nath Tripathi for the Revisionist; Nipun Singh for the Respondent.

Sibghat Ullah Khan, J.

Heard Sri K.N. Tripathi, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri N. Shukla, learned counsel for tenant applicant and Sri Nipun Singh learned counsel for landlord respondent.

This is tenant's revision directed against judgment and decree dated 29.03.2013 passed by J.S.C.C./A.D.J., Court No.9, Kushinagar in S.C.C. Suit No.13 of 1997, Krishna Kumar Goel Vs. Dinesh Chandra. Through the said decree, eviction of tenant applicant has been directed and he has also been directed to pay arrears of rent w.e.f. 02.07.1997 to 29.03.2013 at the rate of Rs.3300/- per month after adjustment of Rs.1100/- per month already deposited. Same amount has been directed to be paid till actual eviction. 8% interest per annum on the unpaid rent has also been directed to be paid. It has further been directed that if the building in dispute is not vacated within two months from the date of judgment, then since after two months till actual eviction apart from the rent/damages for use and occupation at the rate of Rs.3300/- per month, the tenant applicant will be liable to pay Rs.100/- per day more.

According to the plaint allegation, rate of rent was Rs.3000/- per month and tenant was also li


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top