SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 2390

SATISH CHANDRA
Pantaloon Retail – Appellant
Versus
Chief Controlling Revenue Authority/Board of Revenue U. P. – Respondent


ORDER

By this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the orders dated 29-06-2011 passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), Lucknow in Case No. 264/Stamp/2008 under Section 33/47-A of the Indian Stamps Act as well as the order dated 28-05-2012 passed by Chief Controller Revenue Authorities under Section 56(1) A of the Indian Stamps Act in Appeal No. 64 of 2011-12.

2. The facts in narrow compass are that the petitioner and M/s. Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd., had executed an instrument on 15-07-2005 known as Memorandum of understanding (MOU), where both the parties agreed that the petitioner will have a space about 9455.30 sq.ft. (Super area) in a commercial complex known as Saharaganj, Hazratganj, Lucknow on licence basis initially, for a period of three years and the said period shall also be renewable and the same has already been renewed for a total period of 9 years.

3. The petitioner has paid stamp duty of Rs. 100/- on the said instrument (MOU), by considering it as a deed of licence, but the stamp authorities considered the said instrument as a lease deed and demanded stamp duty of Rs. 33,93,500/-. The penalty was also imposed to the tune of





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top