SATISH CHANDRA
Pantaloon Retail – Appellant
Versus
Chief Controlling Revenue Authority/Board of Revenue U. P. – Respondent
By this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the orders dated 29-06-2011 passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), Lucknow in Case No. 264/Stamp/2008 under Section 33/47-A of the Indian Stamps Act as well as the order dated 28-05-2012 passed by Chief Controller Revenue Authorities under Section 56(1) A of the Indian Stamps Act in Appeal No. 64 of 2011-12.
2. The facts in narrow compass are that the petitioner and M/s. Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd., had executed an instrument on 15-07-2005 known as Memorandum of understanding (MOU), where both the parties agreed that the petitioner will have a space about 9455.30 sq.ft. (Super area) in a commercial complex known as Saharaganj, Hazratganj, Lucknow on licence basis initially, for a period of three years and the said period shall also be renewable and the same has already been renewed for a total period of 9 years.
3. The petitioner has paid stamp duty of Rs. 100/- on the said instrument (MOU), by considering it as a deed of licence, but the stamp authorities considered the said instrument as a lease deed and demanded stamp duty of Rs. 33,93,500/-. The penalty was also imposed to the tune of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.