Hon’ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal, J.—Heard Sri Ajit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Jafar Naiyer, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Saurabh Srivastava, leaned counsel for the respondents.

2. Writ petition No. 3434 of 2001 has been filed challenging judgment and order dated 16.9.2000 passed by respondent No. 2 in Civil Revision No. 17 of 2000 (Sajjada Nashin Sufi Liyaqat Hussain v. Fasahat Hussain Shah and another). Writ Petition No. 3436 of 2001 has been filed against order dated 16.9.2000 passed by respondent No. 2 in Civil Revision No. 18 of 2000 (Sajjada Nashin Sufi Liyaqat Hussain v. Fasahat Hussain Shah and another). It may be noted that both the revisions were consolidated and decided by a common order dated 16.9.2000. Challenge in both the writ petition is impugned order dated 16.9.2000 passed in Civil Revision No. 17 of 2000 and Civil Revision No. 18 of 2000. Thus, both the writ petitions are being decided by a common judgment.

3. Facts as stated in the writ petitions are that the petitioners filed Original Suit No. 702 of 1993 with the relief that the defendant respondent be restrained from raising construction over the portion shown in the plai