ANIL KUMAR
HRIDAYA NARAIN TIWARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.—Head Sri B.K. Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri K.K. Shukla, learned State counsel and perused the record.
2. Petitioner/Sri Hridya Narain Tiwari, has been granted an arms licence No. 805 by the Licensing Authority/O.P.No. 2 against the same he holds N.P. Bore Revolver. By an order dated 12.12.2006 passed by Licensing Authority/District Magistrate, Ambedker Nagar, the licence of the petitioner has been suspended and he was asked to submit his reply that why his licence should not cancelled keeping in view the report dated 25.11.2006 and 21.11.2006 submitted by Superintendent of Police and Prabhari Nirikshat Kotwali, Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar on the ground that the petitioner had misused his arm in an incident took place on 20.11.2006, as a result of which he has been implicated in Crime Case No. 134/2007 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C. and in Case No. 107/116 Cr. P.C. as such a recommendation has been made by the police authorities of the district to the licensing authority that the petitioner should not be allowed to keep his arms with him in order to maintain public peace and safety (Lok Hit and Lok Parishanti), aft
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.