SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 703

AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN
JITENDRA PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
M.P.S. Chauhan for the Revisionist; A.G.A. and B.D. Sharma for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Akhtar Husain Khan, J.—Present revision has been filed by revisionist Jitendra Pal Singh under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. against the judgement and order dated 24.1.2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 19, Aligarh in Criminal Revision No. 817 of 2011 (Rajpal Singh and another v. State of U.P. and another).

2. By the impugned order, learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 19, Aligarh has allowed the said revision filed against order dated 11.11.2011 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Aligarh in Case No. 140/12/2010, whereby learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate has rejected final report filed by the police in Crime No. 207 of 2010, under Section 307 I.P.C. and summoned Rajpal Singh and Banti alias Bhanu Pratap Singh for offence punishable under Section 307 I.P.C. Learned Sessions Judge vide his impugned order dated 24.1.2012 set aside the order of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and remanded the matter to learned Additional chief Judicial Magistrate for passing fresh order in the light of his views expressed in his impugned judgement and order. Therefore, complainant Jitendra Pal Singh has preferr


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top