Hon’ble B. Amit Sthalekar, J.—The petitioner in this writ petition is aggrieved by the order dated 21.11.2011 whereby the retiral and other dues of late Abdul Kareem, father of petitioner No. 1 have been with held and the order dated 1.3.2012 whereby the claim for compassionate appointment made by the petitioner No. 1 has been rejected.

2. The case of the respondents is that late Abdul Kareem obtained appointment in the Revenue Department as Lekhpal and he was sent for training of Lekhpal but thereafter it was alleged that the petitioner alongwith some other persons had obtained the appointment by concealment of facts and practicing fraud, therefore their services were terminated under the U.P. Temporary Government Service (Termination of Service) Rules, 1975. This order was challenged by the petitioner alongwith others in Writ Petition No. 1131 (S/S) of 1994 in which late Abdul Kareem was petitioner No. 4 and the writ petition was allowed on the ground that the services of the petitioner could be terminated after giving notice and after following the principles of natural justice. Against the judgment of the High Court dated 16.2.2000 a Special Appeal was filed which was d