SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 933

VINOD PRASAD
GANESH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
T.B. Pandey for the Applicant; A.G.A. and P.N. Tiwari for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Vinod Prasad, J.—In these two connected Applications under Section 482 Cr.P.C., being Application Nos. 6803 of 2003 and 7318 of 2003, two relative applicants Ganesh Singh and his sister-in law Smt. Manju Singh have have prayed for quashing of prosecution of complaint case No. 2535 of 2002, Meera Devi v. Ganesh Singh and others, under Section 138 N.I. Act pending before 1st Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur. Since the facts and prayer in both the applications are common and it both emanates from the same complaint case, hence by this common judgment they are being decided.

Sri T.B. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri V.K. Tiwari, learned counsel holding brief of Sri P.N. Tiwari for the complainant respondent No. 4 and learned AGA for the State have been heard in extenso and record of both the Applications have been scrutinized carefully.

A priory, preceding facts generating these Applications revealed that a complaint was filed by complainant Smt. Meera Devi/respondent No. 4, before 3rd A.C.J.M., Jaunpur with the allegations that she and her husband, Nanhey Seth, were engaged in a cement business in Jaunpur city. Both the applicants Ganesh Singh and Smt. Manju























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top