SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 926

ASHOK BHUSHAN, RANJANA PANDYA
NISHA KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
R.K. Sharma, Ravi Kant, Lakshmi Kant Mishra, Ankur Goel, Inperson, P.C. Srivastava, Vivek Birla, Irshad Ali, B.D. Mandhyan, S. Mandhyan, A.C. Nigam, Haribans Singh, Rakesh Pandey, P.K. Singh, B.K. Tripathi, V.K. Shukla, Parmatma Rai, Rahul Chaturvedi, G.P. Singh, Umesh Chaturvedi, S.P. Saroj, Ved Mani Sharma, Shashi Nandan, M.M.D. Agrawal, Sanjeet Kumar Yadav, S.P. Singh Parmar, Rajendra Mishra, Kaushalendra Nath Singh, P.C. Shukla, B.P. Tripathi, Pradeep Upadhyay, Panaj Shukla and Sharique Ahmad for the Petitioner; C.S.C., Ajeet Kumar Singh, Amit Dubey, B.B. Paul, O.D. Malviya, P.K. Pandey, Q.H. Siddiqui, R.K. Pandey, Vivek Varma, N. Mishra, A.K. Misra, S.C., V.N. Srivastava, Ashok Jaiswal, Satish Chaturvadi, U.K. Uniyal, V.P. Awasthi, A.P. Srivastava, Dr. Abida Sayed, R.A., Ashok Mohiley, B.K. Ojha, R.M. Pandey and D.S. Chauhan for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ashok Bhushan, J.—By this bunch of writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged various fees imposed by the different development authorities constituted under the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘1973 Act’) in the State of U.P. On an application filed by the petitioners seeking permission for carrying out development in the land/building operations, memo of demand has been issued by the Development Authorities imposing different fees/charges subject to which application seeking permission for carrying out development was to be granted. Aggrieved by the various fees and charges raised by different Development Authorities, the petitioners have come up in this Court by means of these writ petitions. Earlier also different fees and charges imposed by the Development Authorities were challenged by means of writ petitions in this Court, which writ petitions have been decided by this Court from time to time, details of which shall be noted hereinafter. Writ petition No. 23281 of 2001 Sabia Khan and others v. Allahabad Development Authority and others, was filed in this Court questioning the legality/validity of water charges/Ma


























































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top