Hon’ble Mrs. Vijay Lakshmi, J.—By means of this revision, the revisionist has questioned the legality of the order dated 2.5.2012 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, (E.C. Act), Rampur whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge partly allowed and partly dismissed the appeal No. 76 of 2011 (Sanjeev Kumar Agarwal v. Rashmi Agarwal) arising out of judgment and order dated 7.10.2011 passed by A.C.J.M. Court No. 1, Rampur in Case No. 224 of 2008 (Smt. Rashmi Agarwal v. Sanjeev Kumar Agarwal), under Section 12 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

2. I have heard Shri I.M. Khan, learned counsel for revisionist and learned counsel for opposite parties.

The brief facts relevant for disposal of this revision are that the revisionist and respondent No. 1 are husband and wife, who were married on 14.5.2003, according to Hindu rites. Gradually the relations between the two got strained and the wife had to leave her matrimonial home. The wife feeling neglected, filed two cases against her husband one under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and the other under Section 12 of Domestic Violence Act. In the complaint case filed under Section 12 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 befo