SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 877

VINOD PRASAD
KAPUR CHAND GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
R.B. Trivedi for the Applicant; A.G.A. and Dinesh Tewari for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Vinod Prasad, J.—Through this Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sole applicant Kapur Chand, Proprietor of M/s. Durga Traders, Mohan Road, district Deoria, has invoked inherent jurisdiction of this Court hankered by the prayer to quash entire proceedings of complaint case No. 534 of 1998, C.R. Foods (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Kapur Chand Gupta, under Sections 406, 420 IPC, P.S. Chhata, District Agra pending before Xth A.C.J.M., Deoria.

2. Since twelve years have gone by and this Application could not have been kept pending final adjudication of the lis because of non co-operative attitude of the counsel for the applicant, that this Application is being disposed off finally with the help of learned AGA Sri Chandrajit Yadav. A glimpse of the record further revealed that albeit Sri Dinesh Tiwari, learned advocate has filed a counter-affidavit alongwith stay vacation application but,even in the revised call, he too is absent, to assist the Court. I have perused and vetted through the entire record critically, have summated factual aspects and have analytically cogitated over the involved issues.

3. On the factual aspects it is discernible from the facts slated in the affid


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top