SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 2350

KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
SULEMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Manish Yadav for the Applicants; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee, J.—This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the order dated 16.4.2013 passed by A.C.J.M., Agra in Case No. 220 of 2012 (Har Narayan v. Suleman) under Section 323, 504, 448 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Sikandara, District Agra, whereby the application seeking discharge under Section 245(2) Cr.P.C. was rejected after holding the same to be not-maintainable.

2. It appears that even on a former occasion the applicants had approached this Court seeking redressal with the prayer not very different in substance. The record reveals that another Bench of this Court vide its order dated 28.8.2012 had disposed of that application with the direction that the applicants may move an application under Section-245(2) Cr.P.C. before the lower Court and seek their discharge. The Court concerned was thereupon directed to pass appropriate order on the discharge application in accordance with law. It seems that the applicants, armed with the direction of High Court, moved an application seeking discharge before the Court concerned but the submissions placed on behalf of the applicants did not find favour with the Court and the discharge applic
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top