SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 953

KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
AAISHA BANO @ MAHZABI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.P. Singh Parmar for the Applicants; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee, J.—This application seeks the quashing of entire criminal proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1287 of 2007 (Sabir and others v. Safique Ahmad) under Section 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Aurai, District -Sant Kabir Nagar (Bhadohi) pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi at Gyanpur, District-Sant Kabir Nagar (Bhadohi).

Heard Shri S.P. Singh Parmar, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. Record has been perused.

2. It seems that in order to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement between the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation Centre by order dated 26.7.2011. The report of Mediation Centre reveals that the aforesaid attempt could not fructify or bring any fruit as no agreement could have been arrived at an amicable settlement. The Court, therefore, deems it fit to decide the matter on merits.

3. It seems that a complaint was brought on behalf of Shafiq Ahmad in the Court against 6 accused persons namely Sabbir, Jahida @ Kamaroonisha, Hazi Abdul Latif, Aaisha Bano, Niyaz Ahmad and Bulbul. It may be relevant to mention that complainant Shafiq Ahmad is the husband of Aaisha Bano a

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top