SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 974

P.K.S.BAGHEL
JAI KARAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BALAK RAM – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Rajesh Kumar and Jai Singh Chandel for the Revisionists; Rajesh Rai and Vishal Mohan Gupta for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble P.K.S. Baghel, J.—This civil revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is directed against the judgement and order dated 11th September, 2012 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 2, Ghaziabad in Suit No. 173 of 2004 (Balak Ram and others v. Jai Karan Singh and others), whereby the amendment application moved by the defendants-revisionists to amend the written statement has been rejected.

2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the plaintiffs-opposite parties instituted a suit, registered as Suit No. 173 of 2004 (Balak Ram and others v. Jai Karan Singh and others), for ejectment of the defendants from the suit property; recovery of a sum of Rs. 2000/- against the defendants; and, for permanent prohibitory injunction for restraining the defendants from making any interference in the possession of the plaintiffs over the suit property. The case of the plaintiffs was that the suit property was owned by Sri Raj Kumar, son of Sri Ghanshyam Das Khetavat, and Sri Rishi Dev Batra, son of Sri Sewa Ram Batra. The plaintiffs purchased the said property by a registered sale-deed dated 10th April, 1985 and were put in possession by




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top