SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 806

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, DILIP GUPTA
BUDH GRAMIN SANSTHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
B.N. Rai and Sumit Kumar Srivastava for the Petitioners; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—The petitioners claim to have executed various work orders which were issued under the National Rural Health Mission, between 10 January 2013 to 17 February 2014. According to the petitioners, the work orders were allotted by the second, third and fourth respondents and payments were sanctioned after satisfactory completion of work. Thereafter, it is alleged that cheques were issued but were not honoured as payment was stopped by the drawers. The petitioners have, thereafter, submitted a representation. Eventually, the writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to clear the cheques in the total amount of Rs. 13,35,983/- after withdrawing the stop payment order and for payment of interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum.

2. On 18 April 2014, we directed the learned Standing Counsel to take instructions as to why the stop payment order had been issued by the department. Accordingly, the learned Standing Counsel has placed on the record, the instructions received by him on 26 April 2014 from the Chief Medical Officer, Siddharthnagar. The instructions reveal that certain irregularities were detected in the disbursement of funds under t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top