SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 132

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : AMAR SARAN AND MRS. SUNITA AGARWAL, JJ.
GIRJA SHANKAR @ RAM SHANKAR AND OTHERS ....Appellants
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ….Respondent
(Criminal Appeal No. 294 of 1983, decided on 16th January, 2014)

Advocates:
Counsel :
G.P. Dixit for the Appellants; A.G.A. for the Respondent.

Headnote:(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Section 302/34—Arms Act, 1959—Section 25—Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Sections 107, 116 and 313—Evidence Act, 1872—Section 27—Murder—Eye-witness—Conviction—Sustainability of—Criminal proceeding pending between parties—Presence of informant not doubtful—Recovery of weapon of crime at pointing out of appellant—Testimony of informant/eye-witness corroborated by medical evidence—Evidence of exhortation is considered to be evidence of weak nature—Conviction/Sentence modified.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top