SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(All) 116

H.N.KAPOOR
Dayawati – Appellant
Versus
Champa Ram – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
G.P. Bhargawa, A.N. Bhargava, V.K. Burman, H.S. Joshi

JUDGMENT

H. N. Kapoor, J.

1. THIS appeal is directed against the order of the Civil Judge, Aligarh dated 24-10-1972 passed in Civil Appeal No. 163 of 1972 allowing the appeal and reversing the order of the learned Munsif for restitution against the respondents under section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. THE facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows :- Sampat Lal, respondent no. 2, obtained a decree for recovery of money against a firm M/s. Rameshwar Dass Ram Narain. Ram Narain, one of pertners of the firm, had died during the pendency of those proceedings and the decree was ultimately passed against the appellant who was the widow of Ram Narain and was substituted as his heir. She was shown as a judgment debtor but it was in respect of the assets of Ram Narain in her hand. In execution of the decree, Sampat Lal got the mortgagee rights in respect of the house in dispute attached and sold. Smt. Dayawati, present appellant, then filed an objection under Order 21 CPC against the sale. That objection was dismissed. In appeal, confirmation of the sale was stayed. Ultimately, the appeal was also dismissed.

On 2-6-1970, Smt. Dayawati again filed an objection under section 47
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top