SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(All) 154

SATISH CHANDRA, K.C.AGRAWAL
Addl. Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Appellant
Versus
Ram Narain Kishan Gopal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Gupta, H.S. Joshi, S.V. Goswami

JUDGMENT

Satish Chandra, J.

1. THE assessee deals in sale of stone, timber and timber goods. For the assessment year 1970-71, the ITO disallowed a sum of Rs. 22,964 which represented purchases made by the assessee for its stock-in-trade but which were made in cash although the individual payments exceeded Rs. 2,500. It was held that Section 40A(3) of the Act applied and the assessee has failed to come within any of the exceptions of Rule 6DD of the Rules. On appeal, the AAC held that the assessee has been able to establish the genuineness of the payments as well as the identity of the persons to whom the payments were made and he, therefore, allowed the appeal and sustained the disallowance only to the extent of Rs. 2,726. THE department went up in appeal to the Tribunal. THE Tribunal held that the word "expenditure" occurring in Section 40A did not include the amounts laid out for purchases of stock-in-trade but it had reference only to deductions that could be made from the gross profits computed after taking into account the sales and purchases only. In this view, it was held that the disallowance made by the ITO were not justified.

2. AT the instance of the department, the Tribun



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top