SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(All) 520

SATISH CHANDRA, M. B. FAROOQI
Commissioner of Income-Tax – Appellant
Versus
British India Corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Gupta, B.D. Agarwal, V.K. Gupta

Judgment

Satish Chandra, C.J.

1. THE interesting questions of law which arise for our consideration in this reference under the Indian I.T. Act are :

"(1) Whether the regular assessment under the Business Profits Tax Act is required to be made within four years of the end of the chargeable accounting period ? and

(2) If not, whether the making of such an assessment after 20 years was making it within a reasonable time ?"

2. THE Tribunal answered the first question in the affirmative and the second in the negative. Hence, this reference at the instance of the CIT.

In respect of various chargeable accounting periods ranging from 1st April, 1946, to 31st March, 1949, the ITO issued a notice under Section 11 of the Business Profits Tax Act, 1947, within a year, and so were provisional assessments made under Section 13 of the Act, the details whereof are as under. The regular assessments were, however, made nearly 20 years later on 30th December, 1969, for all these periods. The tax demand created by the provisional and the regular assessments is also indicated below.

Chargeable Date of Date of Amount of tax Date Amount

Accounting service of provisional of regular of t






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top