High Court Of Allahabad
D. M. Chandrashekhar, R. M. Sahai, JJ.
Commissioner Of Income-Tax : Appellant
Versus
Kohli Khan Bhandar : Respondent
Income-tax Application 1427 of 1976
Decided on: Mar 25, 1977
Rule 6DD(j) - Income-tax - Exceptional and Unavoidable Circumstances
Fact of the Case:
The revenue filed an application under Section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, seeking a direction to the Tribunal to refer a question regarding the applicability of Rule 6DD(j) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
Finding of the Court:
The Tribunal considered various circumstances, including the assessee's new business, lack of market recognition, and the nature of the fertilizer business, and concluded that there was material to support the exceptional and unavoidable circumstances under Rule 6DD(j). The court held that no question of law arose from the Tribunal's order and rejected the application.
Issues: Applicability of Rule 6DD(j) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962
Ratio Decidendi: The sufficiency of materials considered by the Tribunal in determining exceptional and unavoidable circumstances under Rule 6DD(j) cannot be reviewed in a reference under Section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Final Decision: The court rejected the revenue's application as it found no question of law arising from the Tribunal's order.
Chandrashekhar, J.
1. THIS is an application by the revenue under Section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, praying for a direction to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) to refer the following question to this court:
"Whether the Tribunal was justified and had material for holding that the assessee's case was covered by the provisions of Rule 6DD(j) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 ?"
2. THE Tribunal has in para. 4 of its order taken into consideration several circumstances which according to the Tribunal would constitute exceptional and unavoidable circumstances as contemplated by Clause (j) of Rule 6DD of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. Hence, it cannot be said that there was no material before the Tribunal to come to its conclusion. THE Tribunal has taken into account the following circumstances, namely, that this was the very first year of the business of the assessee, that the assessee was not known in the market and hence could not make payments by cheques, that in the fertilizer business supplies are made mostly against cash payments for sales made to consumers and that because of the special nature of the business cash payment was unavoidable. THE sufficiency of these materials cannot be gone into by this court in a reference under Section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Hence, in our opinion, no question of law can be said to arise out of the order of the Tribunal and we reject this application.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.