SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(All) 75

D.M.CHANDRASHEKHAR, R.M.SAHAI
Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Appellant
Versus
Kohli Khan Bhandar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Deokinandan, Ashok Gupta, None

JUDGMENT

Chandrashekhar, J.

1. THIS is an application by the revenue under Section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, praying for a direction to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) to refer the following question to this court:

"Whether the Tribunal was justified and had material for holding that the assessee's case was covered by the provisions of Rule 6DD(j) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 ?"

2. THE Tribunal has in para. 4 of its order taken into consideration several circumstances which according to the Tribunal would constitute exceptional and unavoidable circumstances as contemplated by Clause (j) of Rule 6DD of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. Hence, it cannot be said that there was no material before the Tribunal to come to its conclusion. THE Tribunal has taken into account the following circumstances, namely, that this was the very first year of the business of the assessee, that the assessee was not known in the market and hence could not make payments by cheques, that in the fertilizer business supplies are made mostly against cash payments for sales made to consumers and that because of the special nature of the business cash payment was unav

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top