SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(All) 453

C.S.P.SINGH
Maharaja Dharmendra Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V.D. Singh, Ashok Gupta

JUDGMENT

C.S.P. Singh, J.

1. THE Board of Revenue, in pursuance of the directions issued by this court, referred the following three questions for opinion :

"1. Whether under section 17 of the Act, it is deliberate and conscious attempt at concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars which is liable to penalty or the penalty can be levied even in respect of accidental or clerical mistakes ?

2. Whether the assessee is absolved of the default contemplated by section 17, if he filed a revised return under section 15(4) of the Act before the assessment is made ?

3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the penalty of Rs. 10,000 has rightly been imposed upon the assessee ?"

2. FOR the year 1359F, the assessee filed his return on September 15, 1951. On October 21, 1951, a letter was received by the Naib Tahsildar for checking the books of the assessee which were duly filed. The Naib Tahsildar while checking the books found a number of omissions and inaccuracies in the register of collections maintained by the assessee's Ziledar, when compared with the monthly statement of revenue collections submitted by the assessee's Ziledar. In the statement of the Ziledar, th




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top