SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(All) 419

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
DEOKI NANDAN, J.
Gajram - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Cr. A. No. 3311 of 1973
Decided on : Jul 06, 1978

Advocates appeared:
N.P. Middha

The intention of the accused appellants to murder Janki, the wife of Sukhi, punishable under Section 307 IPC, could not be established beyond a reasonable doubt.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL APPEAL - [SECTION 307/149, 148, 147 IPC] - [ASSAULT] - [INTENTION TO MURDER] - [UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY] - [COMMON INTENTION] - [VOLUNTARILY CAUSING SIMPLE AND GRIEVOUS HURTS] - [SENTENCE] - [COMPENSATION] - [ACQUITTAL] - [CONVICTION] - [IMPRISONMENT] - [FINE] - [BAIL] - [SURRENDER] - [SECTION 323, 325 IPC] - [SECTION 141 IPC] - [SECTION 34 IPC] - [EXPLANATION TO SECTION 141 IPC] - [EX. KA-10] - [EX. KA-14] - [EX. KA-22] - [PW 1] - [PW 2] - [PW 4] - [DW 1] - [SECTION 149 IPC] - [SECTION 148 IPC] - [SECTION 147 IPC] - [SECTION 307 IPC] - [SECTION 323 IPC] - [SECTION 325 IPC] - [SECTION 141 IPC] - [SECTION 34 IPC] - [EXPLANATION TO SECTION 141 IPC] - [EX. KA-10] - [EX. KA-14] - [EX. KA-22] - [PW 1] - [PW 2] - [PW 4] - [DW 1]

Fact of the Case:

A dispute arose over the cultivation of panchayat land between the complainant, Sukhi, and the appellants. The appellants, Gajram, Makhan, and Chandrapal, were seen reaping the harvest of lahi on Sukhi's field. Sukhi objected, and a fight ensued. The appellants were joined by Liladhar, Naikoo, and Bhawani, and the complainant's wife, Janki, son Ramesh, and cousin brother Chiranji came to his defense. All parties sustained injuries during the fight.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellants Gajram, Makhan, and Chandrapal had the common intention of reaping the lahi crop from Sukhi's field and dispossessing him by force. The court also found that the appellants Liladhar, Naikoo, and Bhawani joined Gajram, Makhan, and Chandrapal to help them, but there was no evidence that they shared the common intention of dispossessing Sukhi by force. The court further found that the injuries sustained by Sukhi, Janki, Ramesh, and Chiranji were not grievous and were not caused by dangerous weapons in a manner likely to cause death.

Issues: 1. Whether the appellants were guilty of attempted murder under Section 307 IPC read with Section 149 IPC. 2. Whether the appellants were guilty of rioting under Section 147 IPC. 3. Whether the appellants were guilty of being armed with deadly weapons under Section 148 IPC. 4. Whether the appellants were guilty of voluntarily causing simple and grievous hurts under Sections 323 and 325 IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the appellants Gajram, Makhan, and Chandrapal were not guilty of attempted murder under Section 307 IPC read with Section 149 IPC because there was no evidence that they intended to murder Janki or any of the other victims. 2. The court held that the appellants Liladhar, Naikoo, and Bhawani were not guilty of rioting under Section 147 IPC because there was no evidence that they shared the common intention of Gajram, Makhan, and Chandrapal to dispossess Sukhi by force. 3. The court held that the appellants Chandrapal and Liladhar were not guilty of being armed with deadly weapons under Section 148 IPC because there was no evidence that the ballams they were carrying were likely to cause death if used as weapons of offense. 4. The court held that the appellants Gajram, Makhan, and Chandrapal were guilty of voluntarily causing simple and grievous hurts under Sections 323 and 325 IPC because they had the common intention of beating Sukhi, Janki, Ramesh, and Chiranji and causing them injuries.

Final Decision: The court acquitted the appellants Liladhar, Naikoo, and Bhawani of all charges. The court convicted the appellants Gajram, Makhan, and Chandrapal of voluntarily causing simple and grievous hurts under Sections 323 and 325 IPC and sentenced them to six months and one year of rigorous imprisonment, respectively. The court also ordered the appellants to pay a fine of Rs. 250 each, with Rs. 500 of the fine to be paid to the complainant as compensation.

JUDGMENT

Deoki Nandan, J.

1. THERE are six appellants in this case. All of them have been convicted under Section 307 read with Sec. 149 IPC for having assaulted Janki. Chandrapal and Liladhar appellants have further been convicted under Section 148 I. P. C. for being armed with spears. Gajram, Makhan, Bhawani and Naikoo, appellants were further convicted under Section 147 IPC. The sentence awarded by the learned Sessions Judge was seven years' R.I. for the convicting under Sec. 307/149 IPC to each of the six appellants, three years' rigorous imprisonment to Chandra Pal and Liladhar appellants for the offence under Section 148 IPC and one year's rigorous imprisonment to Gajram, Makhan, Bhawani and Naikoo each for the offence under Section 147 IPC. All the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.

2. THE prosecution case as unfolded in the first information report lodged by Sukkhi was that he had a field having an area of 3-1/2 bighas at ganda nala of the village. He had sown lahi. On the date of occurrence, viz. January 13, 19/0 at about 8-9 A. M. Gajram, appellants, was reaping the harvest of lahi. The complainant, Sukhi, asked him to desist from doing so saying that he (the complainant) had won the case with regard to the land and even then why was he (Gajram, appellant) reaping the harvest, whereupon he (Sukhi, the complinant) was abused and Makhan, Chandrapal and Gajram started beating him with spears and lathis. On his raising alarm Bhawani, Liladhar and Naikoo came with lathis for the help of the appellants while the complainant's wife, Janki, son Ramesh and cousin brother Chiranji came for defending the complainant. On this all the appellants beat him (the complainant) and his family members with lathis and spears. His wife and son were unconscious and he had brought them on a bullcok cart even in that unconscious stage. He lodged the first information report. His cousin brother Chiranji was at home. The first information report proceeds to state that the complainant's men had also wielded lathis which caused injuries to Gajram and Makhan. The complainant's wife and son and cousion brother Chairanji had a number of injuries on their persons. The occurrence was seen by Bhawani Dhimar and Om Prakash etc. The appellants were all Ahirs and influential persons. The police registered a case under Sections 147/148/323/324 and 308 IPC and took certain clothes of the injured into custody. The injured were examined by Dr. D. S. Shukla, Medical Officer in Charge at Chandausi on the same day. He found eight injuries on the person of Ramesh and one contused wound 3" X 1/4" X scalp deep on the left side head 3" above right ear on the person of Janki, wife of Sukhi. This injury was bleeding at that time. The doctor also found fifteen injuries on the person of Sukhi and seven injuries on the person of Chiranji. There is a supplementary medical report in the case of Sukkhi according to which three fractures were discovered on the result of X-Ray, of which the third injury was grievous.

After the necessary investigation by the police and inquiry proceedings by the learned Magistrate, all the appellants were charged under Sections 147, 307 read with Section 149 IPO of the appellants Chandra Pal and Liladhar were additionally charged under Section 148 IPC.

3. IN his examination by the Magistrate, while denying the facts, Gajram stated that the land belonged to panchayat which he had sown and there was an affray thereon. The appellant Makhan added that the cause of the INstitution of the prosecution was the cultivation of panchayat land. Chandra Pal appellant gave the cause of institution of the prosecution as enmity and panchayat land. Bhawani ' appellant also added that the cause of the institution of the prosecution was the panchayat land. But he further added that the panchayat land was first sown by Gajram appellant and then sown by Sukhi, complainant and this dispute between the two was going on for two years. The lahi was ripe.











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top