SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(All) 338

U.C.SRIVASTAVA, K.N.GOYAL
Ghafoor – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Lucknow – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S. Mohd. Husain

JUDGMENT

1. (FOR self and FOR K. N. Goyal, J.) :- After publication of the notification under Section 52 of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act the petitioner moved an application before the Sub-Divisional Officer praying for correction of map prepared by the consolidation authorities on the ground that there was some discrepancy in the map as well as in C. H. Form 45. The application filed by the petitioner was rejected by the Sub-Divisional Officer on the ground that because Consolidation operations were over in the village, as such the map cannot be corrected under Section 28 of the Land Revenue Act or under any other section. The petitioner filed an appeal before the Commissioner, Lucknow Division and the Additional Commissioner relying on Ganga Glass Works (Private) Ltd., Balawali v. State of U. P. 1973 AWR 620 held that the map prepared by the consolidation authorities was final and the revenue authorities were incompetent to make any correction. In that case the learned Single Judge after taking into consideration the provisions of Sections 42-A and 27 (1) of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act held that Section 42-A of the Consolidation of Holdings Act does enable t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top