SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(All) 513

C.S.P.SINGH, R.R.RASTOGI
Prem Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.K. Varma, R.K. Gaulati, A. Gupta

JUDGMENT

C.S.P. Singh, J.

1. THE assessee, who is a partner in the firm, Ayodhya Prasad Gopinath, filed a return showing an income of Rs. 17,951 being share income from that firm. He showed his status as that of a HUF consisting of himself and his wife. THE assessee had, before becoming a partner in the firm, separated from his father and brothers, who formed a HUF on 17th of October, 1962, and an amount of Rs. 3,216 was given to him as his share. This amount was invested by the assessee in the firm, Ayodhya Prasad Gopinath. At the time when he became a partner of this firm, he was unmarried but during the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1971-72, he married and it was for this reason that he claimed that the share income received from the firm should be taxed in the hands of the HUF consisting of himself and his wife. THE ITO, however, did not accept this plea and taxed him in the status of an individual as in the earlier assessment years. THE decision of the ITO was reversed by the AAC. An appeal filed by the department has, however, succeeded. THE Tribunal has now, at the instance of the assessee, referred the following question for the opinion of this court :

"Whethe

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top