The sale proceeds from the sale of timber from planted groves, where there is no evidence of regeneration, are not agricultural income and are not taxable under the U. P. Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1949. Income from trust properties held for religious and charitable purposes is not to be included in the total agricultural income of the assessee.

C.S.P.Singh, J.

1. This is a reference under Section 24 of the U. P. Agrl. I.T. Act, 1949. The Board of Revenue has referred the following questions for the opinion of this court :

"1. Whether the sale of timber from the planted groves prior to the introduction of Section 6-A to the U. P. Agricultural Income-tax Act was liable to be assessed as agricultural income under the Act ?

2. If the answer to question No. 1 be in the affirmative, whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the amount representing the sale proceeds of planted grove and trees was a capital receipt and as such not taxable under the Agricultural Income-tax Act ? and,

3. Whether, on the true interpretation of Section 8 of the U. P. Agricultural Income-tax Act, the income from the property which is held under trust wholly for religious and charitable purposes has to be included in the total income and then a relief is to be granted under Sub-section (2) of Section 3 or is it to be excluded altogether from the total income of the assessee ? "

2. The reference relates to the assessment year 1360 Fasli, the relevant accounting period for which is 1359 Fasli. The assessee returned an income of Rs. 21,63,075 under Section 5 of the Act. In this he did not include the income from the sale of grove and scattered trees. His contention was that the sale price of groves and scattered trees represented the price received from the sale of a capital asset, and, as such, was not exigible to tax. The amount received, according to the assessee, from the sale of scattered trees was Rs. 2,58,984 and from the sale of grove trees, Rs. 88,280. The assessing authority found that out of the amount aforesaid an amount of Rs. 78,267 represented the proceeds of sale in 1358 Fasli, and, as such, was not relevant for the accounting period 1359 Fasli. He, therefore, deducted this amount from the aggregate amount of the sale proceeds from scattered trees and grove trees. Taking the view that the particulars given regarding the break-up of the amount received from the sale of scattered trees and grove trees were not reliable, he apportioned the balance amount as under :

Rs. 90,359 from the sale of planted trees and Rs. 88,280 from the sale of groves and other trees.

He rejected the assessee's contention that this amount could not be included in the income as it was" an amount received, from the sale of a capital asset. Apart from this the assessee had claimed exemption in respect of trust properties, which was created by a registered trust deed for charitable purposes. The assessing authority allowed exemption in respect of these trust properties as he took the view that they were meant for religious and charitable purposes. An appeal was filed by the assessee before the Commissioner, Faizabad, challenging the inclusion of income from the sale of grove and planted trees, and the State also moved for inclusion of income from trust properties. The case taken up by the State was that the income from the trust properties should have been included in the total income and a proportionate exemption should have been given thereafter. It was contended that the assessing authority erred in excluding the income from the trust properties while determining the taxable income. The Commissioner allowed the appeals and remanded the cases on the view that the cases for the earlier assessment year, i.e., 1359 Fasli had been remanded, and the point raised in the appeal was similar to that raised in the earlier case. He also held that the income from the trust properties should be excluded altogether and, as such, rejected the contention on behalf of the State. The State then filed a revision before the Board. The Board, following its decision in an earlier case, held that the income from the sale of the trees should be included in the taxable income of the assessee. As regards the question as to whether the income from the trust properties should first be included and then exempted, it took