P.N.Bakshi

1. An application was filed by Smt. Dhanwanti Devi claiming maintenance-allowance far herself and her two daughters Prern Lata and Hem Lata on the ground that she was legally wedded wife of Singhasan Singh and that the latter had neglected and failed to maintain her. She has no means of livelihood. The husband Singhasan Singh denied his liability to maintain Smt. Dhanwantii. He alleged that she was living an adulterous life and that Hem Lata was not his daughter, but was the off spring of the adulterous connection between Dhanwanti and one Chhabinath. The trial court on a consideration of the evidence on the record came to the conclusion that the allegations of adultery made by Singhasan Singh against his wife Dhanwanti Devi had not been proved. He awarded a maintenance allowance of Rs. 125/- in favour of Smt. Dhanwanti and her two daughters Aggrieved thereby a revision was filed before the Sessions Judge. This revision was dismissed on 4th September, 76, as not pressed. Thereafter a second revision was filed before him which has been allowed on 12th November, 76, hence this revision by Smt. Dhanwantii Devi and her daughters.

2. I have heard learned counsel for t