High Court Of Allahabad
K. S. Varma, S. S. Ahmad, JJ.
Ram Naresh : Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. : Respondent
Writ Petition No. 3021 of 1982
Decided On : Aug 03, 1982
ELECTION - NOMINATION PAPER REJECTION - WRIT PETITION MAINTAINABILITY - ALTERNATIVE REMEDY - U. P. PANCHAYAT RAJ ACT, 1947 - SECTION 12-C - ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner, a member of Gram Sabha Achli Khera, filed his nomination for the office of Gram Pradhan. His nomination was rejected due to his conviction in two criminal cases under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, despite having filed appeals and obtaining a stay on the sentence. He filed a writ petition challenging the rejection and seeking a declaration that the office of Gram Pradhan be declared vacant.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the writ petition was not maintainable as the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 12-C of the U. P. Panchayat Raj Act, which provided a specific mechanism for challenging the rejection of nomination papers.
Issues: 1. Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is maintainable against an order rejecting a nomination paper for the office of Gram Pradhan? 2. Whether the petitioner had an efficacious alternative remedy under Section 12-C of the U. P. Panchayat Raj Act?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in N. P. Ponnuswami v. The Returning Officer, AIR 1952 SC 64, which held that where a right or liability is created by a statute that provides a special remedy for enforcing it, that remedy must be availed of. 2. The court noted that Section 12-C of the U. P. Panchayat Raj Act provided a comprehensive mechanism for challenging the rejection of nomination papers, including the right to file an election petition and seek appropriate relief.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, holding that it was not maintainable in light of the alternative remedy available to the petitioner under Section 12-C of the U. P. Panchayat Raj Act.
S. Saghir Ahmad, J.
1. ON 8-7-1982 we had passed the following order- "For the reasons to be stated hereafter, the petition fails and is dismissed." We now proceed to give the reasons.
2. THE facts giving rise to this writ petition are that in the district of Lucknow there is a Gram Sabha Achli Khera. THE petitioner is a member of the aforesaid Gram Sabha and in the year 1972 he was elected as its Pradhan. THEre was an election for the office of Pradhan notified to be held on 3-6-1982. THE petitioner filed his nomination papers on 12-5-1982. Two other candidates, who are opposite parties 6 and 7, also filed their nomination papers. THE scrutiny of the nomination papers was held on 13-5-82 by the Assistant Returning Officer (Opposite Party no. 5). THE nomination papers of the petitioner was rejected on 13-5-1982 by opposite party no. 5 on the objection of opposite party no. 7 to the effect that the petitioner had already been convicted in two criminal cases under section 302 of Indian Penal Code. It is asserted by the petitioner in the writ petition that the petitioner had filed appeals in this Court against the orders by which he was convicted and that in those appeals the sentence has been suspended. It is further asserted by the petitioner that he had filed certified copies of the orders dated 22-4-1981 and 24-5-79 before the Assistant Returning Officer and inspite of the aforesaid orders, the latter rejected the nomination papers of the petitioner and thus deprived the petitioner of his valuable rights of contesting the election for the office of Gram Pradhan. THE petitioner thereafter submitted a representation before Election Director, Panchayat Raj, Lucknow (Opposite Party no. 2) under section 12-BB of U. P. Panchayat Raj Act (hereinafter to be referred to as Act). He also submitted an application for the removal of the so-called disqualification under section 5-A of the Act before Sub-Divisional Officer.(Opposite Party no. 3), THEse representations were not disposed of by opposite parties 2 and 3 and in the meantime the election took place on 3-6-82 in which the opposite party no. 6 was declared elected. THE petitioner consequently prayed that the order by which his nomination paper was rejected by opposite party no. 5 be quashed and that a writ in the nature of quo-warranto be issued against opposite party no. 6 and the office of the Gram Pradhan of Village Achli Khera be declared to be vacant. Another prayer has been made that the opposite parties 2 and 3 be directed to dispose of the representation already made by the petitioner.
We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. THE learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the present writ petition is maintainable inspite of the alternative remedy available to the petitioner under section 12-C of the Act. His contention is that the remedy by way of election petition would not be an appropriate remedy in the peculiar circumstance of the present case and this court should therefore, in its discretion, interfere in exercise of its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and quash the order by which his nomination paper has been illegally rejected by the Assistant Returning Officer (Opposite Party no.5. THE learned counsel for the petitioner has attempted to canvass before us that the order by which nomination paper of the petitioner was rejected could not have been legally passed by opposite party no. 5, as the petitioner had already been released on bail in the criminal appeals, which he had filed in this court.
4. SECTION 12-1 of the Act provides that no Civil Court shall have jurisdiction to question the legality of any action taken or any decision given by the officer or authority appointed under this Act in connection with the conduct of elections there under. Sub-section (1) of SECTION 12-C provides as under :
"12-C(1). The election of a person as Pradhan of a Gaon Sabha or as member of a Gaon Sabha Panchayat including the e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.