K. P. Singh, J.

1. THIS writ petition arises out of proceedings for cancellation of lease in favour of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner did not plant requisite number of trees over the disputed land and the disputed land was not let out to the petitioner in accordance with law.

2. IT appears that an application was moved by one Sohan Lai making complaint against the petitioner. The Sub-Divisional Officer had taken action against the petitioner and cancelled the lease under the provisions of Sec. 198 (2) of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act (See Annexure "A-1" attached with the writ petition). Thereafter, the petitioner preferred an appeal which was also dismissed by the appellate court through its judgment dated 18-8-1970. Thereafter the petitioner preferred a revision petition which has also been dismissed by the revisional court through its order dated 31-7-1974. Aggrieved by the judgments of the revenue courts the petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended before me that the lease was granted to the petitioner in accordance with Para 58 of the Gaon Sabha