SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(All) 428

S.K.KAUL
Bajmuddin Alias Miyan – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nem Chand Jain, Hari Shanker Jain

JUDGMENT

S. K. Kaul, J.

1. THIS is a petition u/Sec. 482 CrPC with a prayer that the proceedings pending in the Court of the Magistrate u/Sec. 60 Excise Act may be quashed on the following grounds :-

(1) That the investigation in this case was not finished within six months as provided by sub-section (5) of Section 167 CrPC and since no permission of the Magistrate was obtained by the I. O. to continue investigation, the Magistrate could not have taken cognizance of the complaint moved before him on the basis of this investigation.

(2) The second ground was that more than ten hearings took place for adducing prosecution evidence. The prosecution evidence were not given with the result that the accused was being harrassed and as such proceedings should be dropped.

(3) The third ground was that Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned was on leave when the charge sheet was submitted. The Incharge Chief Judicial Magistrate should not have taken cognizance of the charge sheet and as such the cognizance in this case was not legal.

(4) The last point was that the trial of the two petitioners was not proper in as much as the recovery of bottles of liquor from their individual possession was a separ











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top