A tenant who has not perfected title by adverse possession does not have a legal right to continue in possession and is not entitled to a perpetual injunction against the owner or manager of the property.

K. N. Singh, J.

1. THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of Civil Judge, Bijnor, dated 20-3-1978 decreeing the plaintiff-respondent's suit.

2. THE plaintiff-respondents who are 68 in number filed a suit for permanent injunction, restraining the Municipal Board, Chandpur defendant-appellant from interfering with the plaintiff's right to reside in their houses and using the land appurtenant - thereto. The suit was filed with the allegations that the residential houses of the plaintiff are situated on plots Nos. 1507, 1508, 1557 and 1558 in Mohalla Bazar Mehma Sarai in the town of Chandpur. The plaintiffs are in possession of the houses situated thereon and they have been enjoying the open land as Sahan. The plaintiff further asserted that the said houses were in their occupation from the time of their ancestors and they have been repairing and building the said houses. The Municipal Board is not the owner of the houses and land and the land is not Nazul land. The plaintiffs have never paid any tax or rent to the Municipal Board in respect of their residential houses. The plaintiffs further asserted that they were illiterate persons. The Municipal Board taking advantage of their illiteracy obtained signatures while collecting subscriptions during the India-China war in 1962 and the Municipal Board has utilized those signatures for creating some documents against the plaintiffs. The Municipal Board has been trying to oust the plaintiffs from the houses lying in Mohalla Bazar Mehma Sarai treating them trespassers, the Municipal Board has been demanding rent from the plaintiffs on the ground that the site of their houses was Nazul land. The plaintiffs claimed for issue of a permanent injunction restraining the Municipal Board, Chandpur, from evicting them from their houses and from taking any action against the plaintiffs either to realise rent or to dispossess them from any of the houses, land or Sahan in any manner.

The defendant-appellant filed written statement and contested the suit. In its written statement the appellant pleaded that Mehma Sarai situate in Mohalla Bazar is government property and that the land and the houses standing on the plots in dispute situate in Mohalla Bazar Mehma Sarai vest in the State Government and it is Nazul land. The Municipal Board has been entrusted its management. The plaintiffs and their ancestors have been paying rents to the Municipal Board and every year they have been paying rent till 1963 and thereafter they refused to pay rent. Proceedings were taken for their ejectment. The appellant further pleaded that neither the plaintiff-respondents nor their ancestors acquired any legal right or title to the land or buildings, they are not the owners of the same. Since the plaintiffs have not been paying rent, they are liable to be ejected and they are not entitled to any relief of injunction by the court. The appellant further pleaded that the suit was bad for non-joinder of the State Government. The suit was further bad on the ground that 68 plaintiffs had their individual rights and they could not join together to file one suit. The appellant further pleaded that the plaintiffs had filed suits No. 253/63 and 353/63 in the court of Munsif, Bijnor on a similar relief which has been dismissed. The respondents were, therefore, not entitled to maintain the suit. No relief for injunction could be granted in the absence of declaratory relief.

3. THE learned Civil Judge held that the plaintiffs are the owners of their respective houses situate in Mohalla Bazar Mehma Sarai and their possession has remained undisturbed either by the State Government or by the Municipal Board, Chandpur for a long period. The trial court further held that since the houses of the plaintiffs have been in existence for more than 30 years and as no action was ever taken by the defendant-Board or the State Government to realise rent or premium, the plaintiffs acquired title to the land and the building