SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(All) 202

N.N.SHARMA
Harish – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
G.P.Mathur, Daya Shankar Mishra, H.N.Sharma, G.S.Hegde, Satish Trivedi

JUDGMENT

N.N. Sharma, J.

1. This revision is directed against order dated 18-11-1982 passed by Sri B.B. Agarwal, learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Moradabad who allowed Criminal Revision No. 130 of 1982 preferred by opposite parties 2 and 3 and set aside the order dated 6-8-1982 of City Magistrate, Moradabad attaching the property in dispute under Section 146 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Case No. 97/11 of 1982.

2. It appears that dispute relates to plot no. 20 measuring 0.78 decimal situated in Peerzada street of Moradabad City. On 18-6-1982, Harish through Abdul Gafoor and Chhuttan, who are alleged to be his Mufchtar-a-am, applied in the court of City Magistrate, Moradabad for action under sections 145/146 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure about the said land against Vakil Ahmad and Jamil Ahmad.

Learned Magistrate Invited report of S.O. Katghar. He also recorded statement of Sri Jiya Nand Sharma, the then S.O. Katghar on 22-6-1982 and was satisfied that there was apprehension of breach of peace and so after considering the nature of dispute and likelihood of breach of peace, recorded a preliminary order requiring the parties concerned to put-in their written sta
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top