SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(All) 297

M.P.MEHROTRA
Changu Ram – Appellant
Versus
III Addl. District Jugde – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.R.K. Trivedi

Judgment

M.P. Mehrotra, J.

1. BOTH these petitions are connected and they can be disposed of by one common judgment. It is a case of co-tenure-holders. The notice under Sec. 10(2) of the Act was issued to the petitioners in the two petitions and objections were filed. They were decided by the Prescribed Authority and thereafter the matter went to the appellate court. The appellate court passed remand order one after another and the last such remand order dated 18-9-1978 was passed by the appellate court in the case of the petitioner Changu Ram, a true copy whereof is Annexure 7 to his petition. In the case of the petitioner Sita Ram the remand order was passed on the same date and its true copy is Annexure 2 to his petition Thereafter, the Prescribed Authority decided the two cases and his order is dated 11-9-1979 in the case of Changu Ram and a true copy thereof is Annexure 8 to his petition. In the case of Sita Ram also the Prescribed Authority decided the case on 11-9-1979 and a true copy of his order is Annexure 3 to Sita Ram's petition. There-after two separate appeals were filed by the said two tenure-holders and they decided by the appellate court by separate order both dated




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top