M.P.MEHROTRA
Changu Ram – Appellant
Versus
III Addl. District Jugde – Respondent
M.P. Mehrotra, J.
1. BOTH these petitions are connected and they can be disposed of by one common judgment. It is a case of co-tenure-holders. The notice under Sec. 10(2) of the Act was issued to the petitioners in the two petitions and objections were filed. They were decided by the Prescribed Authority and thereafter the matter went to the appellate court. The appellate court passed remand order one after another and the last such remand order dated 18-9-1978 was passed by the appellate court in the case of the petitioner Changu Ram, a true copy whereof is Annexure 7 to his petition. In the case of the petitioner Sita Ram the remand order was passed on the same date and its true copy is Annexure 2 to his petition Thereafter, the Prescribed Authority decided the two cases and his order is dated 11-9-1979 in the case of Changu Ram and a true copy thereof is Annexure 8 to his petition. In the case of Sita Ram also the Prescribed Authority decided the case on 11-9-1979 and a true copy of his order is Annexure 3 to Sita Ram's petition. There-after two separate appeals were filed by the said two tenure-holders and they decided by the appellate court by separate order both dated
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.