SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(All) 239

K.N.GOYAL, R.C.DEO SHARMA
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Murthy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ashish N. Trivedi, Rajiv Sharma

JUDGMENT

K. N. Goyal, J.

1. This writ petition arises out of proceedings for declaration of surplus land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

2. The respondent Mrs. Rakesh Murthy holds a Bungalow No. 31, Butlerganj, Lucknow. On a notice being issued to her under the said Act she filed an objection in which a plea was taken that she was merely a licensee and not an owner and as such there was no question of any surplus land being "held'' by her. On facts also it was pleaded that the area of the land mentioned in the notice was not correct and further that there were three dwelling units and not one on the land. Ultimately the competent authority found that the correct area was 8290 sq. metres out of which she was entitled to the benefit of 6545 and odd sq. metres, and declared 1745 and odd sq. mts. as excess vacant land. Against this declaration the respondent filed an appeal before the learned District Judge. In the memorandum of appeal, which is Annexure No. C-1 to the counter affidavit, again the same legal pleas were taken and it was urged that nothing should have been declared as surplus land.

When the appeal came up for hearing before the learned District Ju
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top