B. L. Yadav, J.

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against the order dated 15-11-1977 passed in a proceeding under section 34 of the U. P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. The facts of the case are that one Ram Khelawan was recorded over the plots in dispute and he died. Thereafter his three sons, namely, Chandra Mani, Durg Vijai and Narain along with his grand sons Anurudh and Ambika made application under section 34 of the Act alleging that they have succeeded the deceased and hence their names may be recorded in place of the deceased. One Smt. Shanti was widow of Chandra Bhan, pre-deceased son of Ram Khelawan and Smt. Gujrati was also a widow. Ambika alleging to be grand son of deceased was the son of Smt. Gujrati whereas he alleged himself to be the son of Smt. Shanti Devi. Anrudh has also died and Smt. Lakhpati, his widow applied for being mutated as the widow of the pre-deceased grand-son of the deceased.

An objection was filed by Smt. Gujrati and Smt. Lakhpati on the application of Ambika that he was not the grand-son of the deceased Ram Khelawan, hence his name should not be recorded in place of Ram Khel