SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(All) 347

A.BANERJI
Mobd. Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Allah Rabbul Alemin – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.H. Zaidi, S.A. Kazmi Khan, M.A. Qadeer

JUDGMENT

A. Banerji, J.

1. This second appeal arises out of a judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge, Bulandshahr, dated April 29, 1972, dismissing the appeal of the defendant-appellants. The trial court had decreed the plaintiffs' suit and cancelled the sale deed dated 22-6-1966 executed by defendant no. 1 in favour of defendant no. 2.

2. The relevant facts briefly stated are as follows : Plaintiffs filed suit no. 77 of 1968 for the cancellation of the sale deed dated 22nd June, 1966 executed by Mohammad Ahmad in favour of Mohammad Arif and also for the cancellation of the Waqf deed dated 22nd May, 1965 executed by the appellant Mohammad Ahmad. Plaintiff's case was that Syed Mohammad Siddiq had created a Waqf in respect of the plots by Waqf deed dated October 11, 1943. The appellant Mohammad Ahmad was appointd Mutwalli of the said Waqf. The Waqf deed also provided that after the appellant Mohammad Ahmad, his two brothers would succeed him as Mutwalli. The deed further stipulated that Mutwalli would have no right to Waqf property. During consolidation proceedings, certain plots were allotted to the Waqf in lieu of the existing plots held by the Waqf. The appellant no. 1, Moha

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top