SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(All) 54

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
A. BANERJI, V.N. KHARE, JJ.
Ram Lal - Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Hamirpur - Respondent
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6073 of 1980
Decided on : Feb 15, 1985

Advocates appeared:
R. Dwivedi, N.B. Nigam

The Consolidation Act does not apply to lands in urban areas like municipalities, cantonments, town areas, or notified areas.

Headnote:

CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS ACT - APPLICABILITY TO URBAN AREAS - SECTIONS 1(2), 3, 4, 64 OF U. P. CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS ACT, 1953; SECTIONS 1(2), 64 OF U. P. URBAN AREAS ZAMINDARI ABOLITION ACT, 1956; SECTIONS 1(2), 8 OF U. P. ZAMINDARI ABOLITION AND LAND REFORMS ACT, 1950 - CONSOLIDATION ACT DOES NOT APPLY TO LANDS IN URBAN AREAS LIKE MUNICIPALITIES, CANTONMENTS, TOWN AREAS, OR NOTIFIED AREAS.

Fact of the Case:

The question referred to the court was whether the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act could apply to land falling within a Municipality or Town Area. The referring order mentioned a decision of a learned single Judge in the case of Harbans Bahadur v. State, where it was held that the Consolidation of Holdings Act applies only to that area to which UP ZA and LR Act has been extended and it cannot be applied to any other area.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Consolidation Act does not apply to lands in urban areas like municipalities, cantonments, town areas, or notified areas. The court reasoned that the Consolidation Act only applies to areas where the Zamindari Act applies, and the Zamindari Act specifically excludes urban areas from its ambit.

Issues: Whether the Consolidation Act applies to land falling within a Municipality or Town Area.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the following provisions of the Consolidation Act, the Zamindari Act, and the Urban Areas Act to reach its decision: * Section 1(2) of the Consolidation Act: This provision states that the Act extends to the whole of Uttar Pradesh, but that it does not apply to areas to which the Zamindari Act does not apply. * Section 1(2) of the Zamindari Act: This provision states that the Act extends to the whole of Uttar Pradesh except for areas that were included in a Municipality, Notified Area, Cantonment, or Town Area on July 7, 1949. * Section 64 of the Urban Areas Act: This provision makes applicable the provisions of Chapter VIII and X of the Zamindari Act to urban areas.

Final Decision: The court answered the question referred to it by holding that the provisions of the Consolidation Act are not applicable to the land which lies in a Municipality, Cantonment, Town Area, or a Notified Area in the State.

JUDGMENT

A. Banerji, J.

1. The question referred to for our consideration in this case is whether U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act can apply to the land falling within Municipality or Town Area. Referring order has mentioned a decision of a learned single Judge in the case of Harbans Bahadur v. State, 1980 AWC 252 where it was held that the Consolidation of Holdings Act applies only to that area to which UP ZA and LR Act has been extended and it cannot be applied to any other area. The referring order has further mentioned that the learned single Judge was aware that the State of U. P. has applied the provisions of Consolidation of Holdings Act (hereinafter referred to as the Consolidation Act) to such land in several districts, and the quashing of notification under section 5 (2) of the Consolidation Act in regard to such land would mean affecting rights of a large number of persons whose claims have been decided by the Consolidation authorities. The referring order further points out that the aforesaid decision in the case of Harbans Bahadur v. State (Supra) has not made any reference to the provisions of Section 64 of the U. P. Urban Areas Zamindari Abolition Act (hereinafter referred to as the Urban Area Act) and also to the provisions of Section 1 (2) (Second proviso) of the UP ZA and LR Act, hereinafter referred to as the Zamindari Act.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties, Dr. R. Dwivedi and Shri N. B. Nigam. Dr. Dwivedi argued that the Consolidation Act applied also to agricultural land situate within the boundaries of a Municipality, Cantonment, Town area and Notified Area. Any land to which the provisions of Chapter VIII and X of the Zamindari Act had application would be land to which the Consolidation Act also applied. He referred to the provisions of Section 64 of Urban Area Act and Section 1 (2) (second proviso) of the Zamindari Act in support of his above contention. Mr. N. B. Nigam, learned counsel for the respondents urged that Consolidation Act had no application in urban areas like Municipality, Cantonment, Town Area or a notified area for the reason that the provisions of the Zamindari Act had no application to these areas. The Consolidation Act would only apply where the Zamindari Act applied. He further urged that the decision in Harbans Bahadur case (Supra) correctly laid down the law and the provisions of Section 64 of the Urban Area Act or Section 1 (2) (second proviso) of the Zamindari Act did not affect the law laid down in the above decision.

We think the correct approach would be to look into the Consolidation Act itself to find out if there is any limitation as to the scope of that Act. In Section 1 (2) of the Consolidation Act it is laid down that it extends to the whole of Uttar Pradesh, but that would not decide the matter. The Consolidation Act has its limitations. Reference may be made to the definition of "Consolidation Area ". Section 3. In this Act unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context- (2-A) 'Consolidation Area' means the area in respect of which notification under Section 4 has been issued, except such portions thereof to which the provisions of the UP ZA and LR Act, 1950, do not apply. Section 4 of the Consolidation Act contains provisions for declaration and notification regarding consolidation operations in a district or part thereof. We may now revert to the definition of the "Consolidation Area". This definition makes it clear that consolidation area is an area in respect of which a notification under Section 4 of the Consolidation Act has been issued. There is, however, one exception and that is "except such portions thereof to which the provisions of the UP ZA and LR Act, 1950, do not apply". This means that the area to which the Zamindari Act has not been made applicable, notification under Section 4 of the Consolidation Act cannot be issued in respect of such area. It leads to the conclusion that the consolidation area cannot be in respec










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top