SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(All) 311

P.DAYAL
Ramji Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
B.P. Srivastava, S.S. Awasthi

JUDGMENT

P. Dayal, J.

1. The facts giving rise to this petition are that the revisionists are alleged to have beaten Ram Kumar on 26-11-80 at about 10 a.m. in Itaunja, P. S. Itanja, district Lucknow. The informant Rajendra Prasad Nigam went to their rescue and he was also beaten. He lodged a FIR. It is further alleged that the police personnel reached there and arrested Jai Prakash Pandey and Ramji Tripathi.

2. The revisionists were prosecuted for offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 149 IPC. Some of the witnesses had turned hostile and only Rajendra Prasad Nigam who was the informant gave his statement in support of the prosecution.

The learned Magistrate acquitted the revisionists for an offence punishable under Section 323 IPC and convicted and sentenced them under Section 147 IPC each to pay a fine of Rs. 80/- and in default to undergo ten days' imprisonment.

3. Section 147, laying down the punishment for rioting, provides that whosoever is guilty of rioting, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine or with both.

4. The term ' rioting ' has been defined that whenever force and violence is used by an



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top