SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(All) 419

A.N.DIKSHITA
Balbir Singh Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
Vijai Kumar Agarwal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
O.P. Singh, S.M. Dayal

Judgment

A.N. Dikshita, J.

1. AGGRIEVED by the judgment and order dated 4-8-1986 passed by the 8th Additional District Judge, Kanpur City, in Misc. Case No. 16/74 of 1986, by which an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC read with section 151 CPC filed by the applicant for setting aside the judgment and order dated 18-3-1986 decreeing the suit ex-parte has been rejected, this Civil Revision has been preferred by the applicant.

2. IN a narrow campus the facts are that the plaintiff opposite party filed a suit for the eviction and recovery of arrears of rent against the applicant in the court of District Judge, Kanpur City. The applicant after putting in his appearance filed an application on 18-2-1986 praying for granting a month's time to file a written statement which was allowed and time up to 18-3-1986 was granted to file the necessary written statement. To ascertain certain facts and relevant dates the record of the lower court was summoned.

3. ON 21-2-1986 the suit pending in the court of the District Judge, Kanpur City, was transferred to the Court of 8th Additional District Judge, Kanpur City, for disposal according to law. ON 18-3-1986 when the case was taken up by the trans










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top