SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(All) 388

R.M.SAHAI, B.N.MISRA
Ramadhar Shashtri – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Education, Iv Region, Allahabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Khare

Judgment

1. BY the Court -This petition is directed against order dated 12th September, 1986 passed by Deputy Director of Education, IV Region, Allahabad in exercise of power u/Sec. 16-A (7) of U. P. Intermediate Education Act.

2. IT is not disputed that the hearing was done on 27th May, 1986. After hearing both the parties the Deputy Director permitted both parties to file documents upto 10th June, 1986. IT is further not disputed that both parties did file their evidence which was not only examined but relied by the Deputy Director of Education. Needless to say, that the procedure adopted by Deputy Director was contrary to law. Filing of documents should have preceded the hearing. The Deputy Director in reversing the process committed grave error of procedure which vitiated his order. Learned counsel urged that even if the documents filed after hearing are ignored the order of Deputy Director can be maintained on other material. The argument is not available since it cannot be assessed to what extent the Deputy Director was influenced with the evidence filed lateron.

3. IN the circumstances the Deputy Director of Education is directed to decide the dispute afresh after hearing bot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top