K.C.AGRAWAL, B.L.YADAV
Shiv Shanker Sitaram – Appellant
Versus
Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal – Respondent
K.C. Agrawal, J.
1. THIS petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has prayed for a number of reliefs. One of them is for setting aside the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax dated September 19, 1985, by which penalty was reduced or waived by 50% under Section 273A(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. SECTION 273A(4) of the Income-tax Act confers discretion on the Commissioner to reduce or waive the amount of any penalty payable by the assessee under this Act, if he is satisfied that--
"(i) to do otherwise would cause genuine hardship to the assessee, having regard to the circumstances of the case; and
(ii) the assessee has co-operated in any enquiry relating to the assessment or any proceeding for the recovery of any amount due from him."
The Commissioner of Income-tax considered the relevant facts while dealing with the application under SECTION 273A(4) and on the satisfaction that the petitioner co-operated with the income-tax authorities in the course of assessment and payment of tax, reduced the penalty by 50 per cent. It could not be and was not disputed before us that SECTION 273A(4) is discretionary in nature. We could have interfered if the discretion had not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.