SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(All) 382

K.C.AGRAWAL, B.L.YADAV
Shiv Shanker Sitaram – Appellant
Versus
Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N. Verma

Judgment

K.C. Agrawal, J.

1. THIS petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has prayed for a number of reliefs. One of them is for setting aside the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax dated September 19, 1985, by which penalty was reduced or waived by 50% under Section 273A(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

2. SECTION 273A(4) of the Income-tax Act confers discretion on the Commissioner to reduce or waive the amount of any penalty payable by the assessee under this Act, if he is satisfied that--

"(i) to do otherwise would cause genuine hardship to the assessee, having regard to the circumstances of the case; and

(ii) the assessee has co-operated in any enquiry relating to the assessment or any proceeding for the recovery of any amount due from him."

The Commissioner of Income-tax considered the relevant facts while dealing with the application under SECTION 273A(4) and on the satisfaction that the petitioner co-operated with the income-tax authorities in the course of assessment and payment of tax, reduced the penalty by 50 per cent. It could not be and was not disputed before us that SECTION 273A(4) is discretionary in nature. We could have interfered if the discretion had not


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top