SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(All) 269

N.D.OJHA, R.K.GULATI
Bishwanath Prasad And Sons – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income-Tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.B.L. Srivastava, Bharatji Agarwal

Judgment

1. HAVING heard, counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that the following question is a question of law arising out of the order of the Tribunal :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in dismissing the application under Section 254(2) of the Act on the ground that it was virtually a review application ?"

2. THE Income tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad, is accordingly directed to draw up a statement of the case and refer the aforesaid question of law to this court for its opinion.

The applicant shall be entitled to costs assessed at Rs. 125.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top