SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(All) 2

S.D.AGARWALA, ANSHUMAN SINGH
Rarindra Singh Niranjan – Appellant
Versus
District Inspector Of Schools, Jhansi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Pradeep Chandra

JUDGMENT

S. D. Agarwala, J.

1. By means of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated October 13, 1987. In this order, the District Inspector of Schools, Jhansi, has refused to give approval to the ad hoc appointment of the petitioner in Gandhi Vidyalaya Inter College, Mauranipur, district Jhansi, in the C. T. Grade on the ground that the provision of section 18 of the Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Board Act, 1982 (U. P. Act No. 5 of 1982) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) does not apply.

2. Parties are agreed that since the petition involves a pure question of law, it may be disposed off finally at this stage.

Section 18 of the Act provides for the appointment of ad hoc teachers in certain contingencies. Sub-section (1) of section 18 of the Act deals with the appointment of teachers specified in the Schedule. Sub-section (2) deals with the appointment of teachers other than teachers specified in the Schedule with the substitution of the expression "Board' for the expression 'Commission'. Section 18 sub-sections (1) and (2) which are relevant for the purposes of determini









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top