RAVI S.DHAVAN
Jagat Narain Dwivedi – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Civil Judge Vi, Kanpur Nagar – Respondent
RAVI S. DHAVAN, J.
1. A landlord has cut off the basic amenities of his tenant, and deprived the latter of the privy and toilet, and water also. The tenant, the petitioner before this Court, complained to the Prescribed Authority under section 27 of the U. P. Urban Buildings (Reg. of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. The Prescribed Authority, after hearing both, the tenant and the landlord directed by an order of 13th January, 1987 that the aforesaid amenities should be restored within fifteen days of the order aforesaid, failing which the tenant could have these facilities restored at the landlord's expense.
2. Within two days of the order of the Prescribed Authority, the landlord sought the recall of the order dated 13th January, 1987, under section 27 of the Act. The reason, the landlord was seeking the eviction of tenant by an application under section 21 of the Act, for the release of the accommodation. The application of the landlord, by which he resisted the order to restore the amenities is being set on record of the judgment. " In the Court of VI Addl. Munsif/P. A., Kanpur B.C. No. 15/85 Jagat Narain v. Shamboo Dayal Application on behalf of opposite party Sir
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.