SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(All) 135

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
R.R. MISRA, J.
Pheru Singh - Appellant
Versus
Nayadar - Respondent
Second Appeal No. 720 of 1987
Decided on : Mar 10, 1987

Advocates appeared:
B. Malik, Tarun Agarwal

The right to lodge a caveat under Section 148-A of the Code of Civil Procedure is limited to suits or proceedings in the trial court and does not extend to appeals or revisions.

Headnote:

CAVEAT - RIGHT TO LODGE - SECOND APPEAL - APPLICABILITY OF SECTION 148-A OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - RESPONDENT'S RIGHT TO APPEAR AT ADMISSION STAGE - SCOPE AND INTERPRETATION.

Fact of the Case:

In a second appeal, a caveat was filed by the plaintiff-respondent, raising a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the caveat application. The appellant challenged the maintainability of the caveat, arguing that no caveat lies in second appeals and the caveator has no right of hearing at the admission stage.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the respondent in a second appeal has no right to file a caveat and of hearing either in the matter of admission of appeal or for opposing the interim matter as well. It further held that the provisions of Section 148-A of the Code of Civil Procedure are inapplicable in such a situation.

Issues: 1. Whether a caveat can be filed in a second appeal? 2. Whether the respondent in a second appeal has a right to appear at the admission stage? 3. Scope and interpretation of Section 148-A of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. Section 148-A of the Code of Civil Procedure allows any person claiming a right to appear before the Court on the hearing of an application in a suit or proceeding to lodge a caveat. 2. The right to lodge a caveat is not limited to parties to the suit or proceeding but extends to any person who has a right to appear before the Court. 3. The words "suit or proceedings" used under Section 148-A of the Code of Civil Procedure are confined only to the suit or proceedings in the trial court and do not include appeals or revisions. 4. The respondent in a second appeal does not have a right to appear as of right at the admission stage and to oppose the same.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appellant's preliminary objection and held that the respondent in a second appeal has no right to file a caveat and of hearing either in the matter of admission of appeal or for opposing the interim matter as well. It further held that the provisions of Section 148-A of the Code of Civil Procedure are inapplicable in such a situation.

JUDGMENT

Dr. R. R. Misra, J.

1. Pheru Singh, the defendant-appellant, has filed the present second appeal in which a caveat has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff-respondent. At the time of the admission-hearing of the appeal, a preliminary objection was raised by the learned counsel for the appellant regarding maintainability of the caveat application. Accordingly learned counsel for the parties have been heard.

2. The first objection taken by the learned counsel for the appellant is that no caveat lies in second appeals and the caveator has got no right of hearing at the admission stage as the provisions of Section 148-A of the Code of Civil Procedure are not applicable in such a case. This objection has been stoutly refuted to by the learned counsel for the caveator. Sri Tarun Agrawal, Advocate, who appears as counsel for the caveator, submits that the aforesaid objection raised by the appellant has got no force. In support of his submission, he relies on the provisions of Section 148-A of the Code of Civil Procedure. The said section reads as follows :-

"148-A. Right to lodge a caveat- (1) Where an application is expected to be made, or has been made, in a suit or proceeding instituted, or about to be instituted, in a court, any person claiming a right to appear before the Court on the hearing of such application may lodge a caveat in respect thereof. (emphasis supplied). (2) Where a caveat has been lodged under sub-section (1), the person by whom the caveat has been lodged (hereinafter referred to as the caveator) shall serve a notice of the caveat by registered post, acknowledgement due on the person by whom the application has been, or is expected to be, made under subsection (1). (3) Where, after a caveat has been lodged under sub-section (1), any application is filed in any suit or proceeding, the Court shall serve a notice of the application on the caveator. (4) Where a notice of any caveat has been served on the applicant, he shall forthwith furnish the caveator, at the caveator's expense, with a copy of the application made by him and also with copies of any paper or document which has been, or may be, filed by him in support of the application.

A scrutiny of the aforesaid provisions reveals that sub-section (1) of section 148-A of the Code of Civil Procedure sets out the conditions under which a caveat may be lodged by any person. The right to lodge the caveat belongs not only to a party to the suit or proceeding but to " any person " who claims a right to appear before the Court at the time of the hearing of the application in a suit or proceeding instituted or about to be instituted in a Court. As regards the conditions, such caveat is to be lodged in respect of application " in a suit or proceeding " and by a party who has a right to appear (emphasis supplied) before the Court on the hearing of such application. Under sub-section (2) of the aforesaid section of the Code, if such a caveat has been lodged, such caveator has to serve a notice of the caveat on the person making the application under sub-section (1) of the said section. Under sub-section (3) when an application is filed in any suit or proceeding, it is obligatory on the Court to serve a notice of the application on the caveator. After service, the caveator is to be furnished with a copy of the application (accompanied by copies of the documents filed in support of the application) made by the party concerned at the expense of the caveator.

3. The term "caveat" is a word which conveys the idea of a caution notice given to the Court not to issue any grant or take any step without notice being given to the party lodging the caveat. It is in the nature of a precautionary measure, therefore, taken against the grant of an order by the Court effecting the rights of a party. This system of lodging a caveat has its origin in the matters of grant of probate or letters of administration wherein this precautionary measure was necessary affecting the rights of t
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top