R. P. Singh, J.

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against the order passed by Additional District Judge, Allahabad dated 14-8-1987.

2. The facts of this case are that respondents 2 to 6, the landlord respondents, filed an application under section 21 (1) (a) of U. P. Act 13 of 1972 for the release of the accommodation in dispute which application was allowed by the Prescribed Authority against which order the petitioner filed an appeal before the learned Additional District Judge. During the pendency of the appeal, the landlords filed an application for admission of the additional evidence to show that the number of family members of respondent-landlords have increased and hence the need of the landlords is more pressing. This application was opposed by the petitioner but the landlords' application for additional evidence was allowed by the learned Additional District Judge and the petitioner was allowed time to file evidence in rebuttal of the same. The petitioner have averred that during the pendency of these proceedings the landlord-respondents, who got possession of the accommodation prosecutely in their possession from late L. Chandra A