SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(All) 509

M.L.BHAT
Shital Prasad Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate appeared:
Radhey Shyam

JUDGMENT

M.L. Bhat

1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner's case is that he is not allowed the benefit of service in a Private School on the basis of some Government order by which the previous Government order was superseded and it was desired that those, who retired between 13-6-1979 and 10-1-1986, shall only be given pensionary benefit by including their previous service in non-government institutions, in case they have deposited the shares of the employer towards the Provident Fund etc. The Govt., order, therefore, makes it possible only for those persons, who have retired between 13-6-1979 and 10-1-1986 to get the benefit of previous service in non-government institutions and it excludes the others from such benefits. The classification would mean that anybody, who has retired before 13-6-1979 or after 10-1-1986 will not be given the benefit of service in non-government institution. The classification made by the State on the basis of dates of retirement among the retired government servants does not appear to be reasonable and is opposed to the guarantees contained in Article 14 of the constitution.

The Supreme Court in the case of D. S. Nakara, report






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top