SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(All) 840

R.A.SHARMA
Shiv Nath – Appellant
Versus
District Judge, Nainital – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate appeared:
Rajesh Tandon

JUDGMENT

R.A. Sharma

1. Petitioners filed a suit for permanent injunction, in the court of learned Civil Judge, Nainital, for restraining the defendants (State Government and four others) from interfering with their possession on the land in dispute. In that suit the petitioners also made an application for interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC so as to restrain the defendant-respondents from interfering with their possession over the property in dispute, during pendeney of the suit. The case set-up by the petitioners before the court below was that they are in possession of about 400 Acres of land of the Government for the last about eight to ten years and are entitled to continue in possession in view of the policy of the Government of allotting the land to the weaker section of the public. The defendants, while opposing the relief of the plaintiff-petitioners, controverted the allegations made by the petitioners and urged that the petitioners have formed a gang and are trying to usurp the land in dispute which is part of the reserve forest of the Government of U. P. In this connection the defendants have stated that there is vast agricultural land in the name of some of th













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top