SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(All) 768

V.N.KHARE
Asha Ram – Appellant
Versus
Ghasita – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A.K. Yog, N.A. Kazmi

JUDGMENT

V.N. Khare

1. The above second Appeal fled on behalf of the plaintiff-appellants and the cross objection, filed on behalf of defendants- respondents-objectors, arise out of the judgment and decree passed by Civil Judge. Muzaffarnagar on 13th of July 1979 in Civil Appeal No. 404 of 1978, and, therefore, both are feeing disposed of by a common judgment.

2. Asha Ram, the plaintiff, filed Suit No 45 of 1977 for issue of permanent injunction restraining the defendants-respondents from interfer ng, in any way, with his possession over the land in dispute According to the plaint allegations the plaintiff-appellant (ASHA Ram) was the Bhumidhar in possession over plot No. 355 measuring 16 Biswas situate in village Dinkarpur Pargana Shikarpur district Muzaffarnagar, alongwith Mitter Sen and others. The land has been shown by letters A B C D in the site plan attached to the plaint. It was alleged that there stood trees of mango, Neem. Pipal, Guava and Shisham etc. on the said land and there also existed a Kachha Kothri and a fodder cutting machine on the said land. Alternatively, the plaintiff (ASHA Ram) alleged that the land was settled with him under section 9 of the U. P. Zamindari












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top