SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(All) 764

N.L.GANGULY
Laxmi Narain Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Maha Narain Kapoor – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Dinesh Kakkar, S.K. Mehrotra

JUDGMENT

N.L. Ganguly

1. At the time of initial hearing of this civil revision, the Court was pleased to direct that the applicant may serve the respondents, so that the court may have the version of the respondents also. Sri S. K. Mehrotra has tiled his appearance before this court and the Civil Revision has been argued on merits.

2. Heard the counsel for the parties.

This civil revision is directed against the order of the learned Civil Judge by which the amendment prayed by the plaintiff was allowed in the plaint. The plaintiff/respondents had initially filed a suit seeking the following reliefs :- (a) A decree for declaration declaring that the sale deeds dated 19-9-83 executed by the defendant nos. 5 to 13 in favour of the defendant nos. 1 to 4 as per the details furnished herein below are void, ab-initio, ineffective, inoperative of no consequences conferring no right, title or interest in respect of any part of premises no. 47/88, Hatia Kanpur upon the defendant nos. 1 to 4 to the detriment of the plaintiff, thereby consequently restraining the defendant nos. 1 to 4 their agents, servants, heirs, assigns, attorneys, etc. through a decree of permanent injunction from in any ma






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top