Palok Basu, J

1. The petitioner who is the wife has challenged the order of the trial Judge dated 12-8-88 whereby he refused 10 permit the petitioner to amend or substitute the written statement in a Divorce suit filed by husband Opposite party Having heard Sri Brij Raj Singh learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. D. Pathak learned counsel for the contesting opposite party at length and perusal of materials, various annexure filed alongwith affidavit, counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit, this writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage.

2. The controversy is as to whether due to the so-called admissions made by the petitioner in the written statement purported to have been filed by her, which is being stoutly denied by the petitioner at every stage and the fact that the petitioner did not press a similar application for amendment on an earlier occasion, the trial court must discard the fresh prayer that said written statement be not relied upon and the petitioner be permitted to substitute or amend it The facts are that Ravindra Singh has filed a suit seeking divorce from the petitioner. There exists a written statement on the record which