SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(All) 397

VIRENDRA KUMAR
Mumtaz – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
S.H.Ibrahim

JUDGMENT

Virendra Kumar, J.

1. This criminal revision is filed by II persons who are accused in Sessions Trial No. 13 off 1986 pending before 6th Addl. Sessions Judge, Faizabad. Grievance of the revisionists is that the charge under Section 307 read with Section 149 IPC framed against all of them is unwarranted and groundless, hence this should be quashed.

2. Learned counsel for both the parties have been heard. First Information Report was lodged by the Head Constable Bhullan Dubey on 21-8-88 against all the revisionists as accused. According to the FIR informant Head Constable Bhullan along with other constables was on duty in connection with procession of Moharram on that date. When the procession reached near the Chhappar of Ram Dularey by passing through its route, all the accused-revisionists collectively threw bricks and stoness at the house of Ram Dularey as well as on Police personnel who were on duty. One of the contable, namely, Parusu Ram Dubey was asked to go and give information to the Police Station but the accused-revisionists caught hold of his cycle and started up-rotting the Chhapper of Ram Dularey. As a result of the throwing of bricks and stones one of the consta
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top